New Lithium Battery Transportation Regulations for 2025

New Lithium Battery Transportation Regulations for 2025

“When a fully charged NCM811 battery undergoes thermal runaway at 30,000 feet, the energy released is equivalent to 86 grams of TNT – which explains why IATA has built aviation safety defenses with a 30% SOC limit and a 3-meter stack yard test. As an engineer involved in the development of the UN38.3 test item, I will dismantle the life and death of the new 2025 lithium battery transportation regulations.”

I.The UN numbering system: lithium battery “dangerous goods ID card”.

New UN numbering for sodium-ion batteries in 2025

UN No.Applicable objectsPackaging GuideTransportation scenarios
UN 3480Lithium-ion battery (separate)PI 965Bare cell/battery pack
UN 3481Lithium-ion battery (built-in/packaged in equipment)PI 966/967Cell Phone/Notebook
UN 3551Sodium-ion battery (separate)PI 976New Energy Storage Battery
UN 3556Lithium-ion battery-powered vehiclesPI 952Electric vehicles/forklifts (mandatory from 2025.4)

Fatal Misconceptions Warning

UN 3171 phase-out: this number is banned for lithium battery vehicles after March 31, 2025 (UN 3556/3557 instead) 

Sodium-ion Battery Trap: organic electrolyte sodium batteries must be shipped with PI 977, water-based electrolytes are exempt from the hazmat process

 Lithium Battery Transportation

II. State of Charge (SOC): 30% life and death red line

Sub-scenario power limits

Type of transportationRequirements for 2025Mandatory upgrade in 2026
UN 3480(separate battery)SOC ≤30%Violators denied boarding
UN 3481(>2.7Wh)Suggested SOC ≤30%SOC ≤30% + stacking test
Electric vehicles (UN 3556)Suggested SOC ≤30%>100Wh battery mandatory SOC ≤30%

Engineer’s formula: SOC = (current capacity / rated capacity) x 100% 

Case: 100Ah energy storage battery must be transported with ≤30Ah of remaining power, otherwise the risk of triggering thermal runaway ↑300%

III.Packaging and Testing: Physical Defense for Aviation Safety

1. 3-meter stacking test (added in 2025)

Test standard: packaging pieces need to withstand 3m high equivalent total package weight for 24 hours (simulate cargo hold stacking pressure) 

Exemption condition: metal/hard plastic boxes can be substituted for physical test by FEA simulation report 

Failure case: a manufacturer’s ABS shell deformed by 12mm → short circuit of battery cell caught fire (2025.1 Accident Report)

2. Packing Instruction (PI) Selection Tree

A. Battery type –> Is it shipped separately? –> Yes –> UN 3480 → PI 965

B. Battery type –> Is it transported separately? –> No –> Is it in the device? –> Yes –> UN 3481 → PI 967

C. Battery type –> Is it transported separately? –> No –> Is it in the equipment? –> No –> UN 3481 → PI 966

Section II Exemption Dividend: PI 967 Section II allows for exemption of DGD documents (limited to 5kg/box).

3. New labeling regulations

“Lithium battery labeling” → “Battery labeling”: need to include UN number (e.g. UN 3551)

Labeling update for Class IX: “Lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries” replaces the original wording

New Lithium Battery Transportation Regulations for 2025

IV. Documentation system: the “passport” for compliant transportation

List of core documents

UN38.3 test summary: must include T.1-T.8 eight tests (thermal shock/overcharge/extrusion, etc.)

MSDS report: electrolyte components must be indicated (e.g. LiPF₆ concentration >20% needs to be labeled additionally)

DGD Dangerous Goods Declaration: UN 3481 Section II is exempted, UN 3480 is mandatory.

Stacking test report: new mandatory option from 2025 (FEA simulation certificate for plastic packaging)

Engineer’s Warning: Sodium ion batteries need to provide additional emergency response plan for sodium leakage (according to PI 976.3.2.1).

New Lithium Battery Transportation Regulations for 2025

Flow chart of air transportation practice

Confirm the battery type → Determine the SOC (≤30%) → Select the UN number → Match the PI packing guide → Complete the 3-meter stacking test → Label the new regulations → Prepare the four major documents

Attachment: A company’s sodium batteries worth $2.2 million were seized by Dubai Customs due to confusion between UN 3481 and UN 3551.

Similar Posts